Really, would this man lie to us?
This is still sounding like fiction and im well aware of that. This is merely an establishment of the conspiracy theory and where it came from. The history of the conspiracy if you will. But you're right, most considered this nothing more than a fable, that is until recently. It is believed that the US and Israeli, government had been involved in archaeological digs, with what now seems like a religous agenda. While there are no real dates stipulating the times of the digs, we can assume that due to Israeli involvement it happened in the past fifty years. Though its what was discovered on these expeditions however, that would breathe a whole new life into the novel written one hundred years earlier....
Just awful....
It is alleged that just out of Jerusalem, archaeologists uncovered what is said to be the same cross on which Jesus was crucified. Pretty cool eh? Moreover, the cross was stained with minute samples of blood. With DNA samples being taken from 70,000 year old neanderthal fossil, Forensic Anthropologist of University College London, Mark Thomas has theorised that DNA samples could be tested from the cross, should it exist. And test it they did! What the results found though was that the DNA was like nothing that had been previously observed. It was encoded not on a regular double helix, but a triple helix! and was immediately classed as a new species "Homo Superioris". This discovery re-established the Vril theory and the world lived at one with the new super humans. Wait, what? Why haven't we heard anything about this? Why arn't i sinking frothys with wolverine? Or slaying "storm"? Well here is one theory...
Oh yeah, this happened!
Jesus was another species, yep he exsisted, but he was not human, rather he was Homo Superioris. It actually makes more sense than you might give it credit for. All the "powers" mentioned in Bulwer-Lyttons novel can be traced back to the feats of J Christ. Levitation (walking on water), Healing powers, telepathy (being able to understand peoples needs). When you think about it, having an advanced strand of DNA seems a hell of a lot more plausible than being the child of immaculate conception and the son of a sky fairy, dont you think? And in lies the conspiracy.
Homo Superioris does exist or at least did. Jesus being the first person to surface in society and incidentally the last. While that sounds wholly unconvincing, there is a very good reason we didnt hear of anymore triple helixed beings. The catholic church took a big punt on claiming Jesus as the "son of God" and it could have payed off. But Jesus was not the son of God he was a genetic anomaly and not the only one. So with it only a matter of time until people started wising up, the church have been "taking care of it" ever since. A big allegation i know, but think about it, catholicism wouldnt have much to stand on if everyone found out the lord and savior was nothing more than just a unique DNA specimen. Moreover, with the church controlling the "Vril" society, they can dictate the "second coming of Jesus". Perhaps at a time when sceptics are at their peak? Either way its a scary thought.
Irregardless is not a word. Regardless is the word you were thinking of. Look at it: "Regard-less". "Ir-regard-less" is a double negative. It doesn't help to be condescending in your article when you, yourself, are proven fallible and idiotic. This is commonly known as "Muphry's Law". No, that is not misspelled. Look it up.
ReplyDeleteIf Jesus had triple helix DNA it wouldn't discredit Him being the Son of God. It would actually confirm the opposite. 3 helix, 3 in the Trinity, 3 days on the cross, 3 days before the resurrection,etc.... 3 helix would explain His supernatural, or homo superior status. He was the Son of God! Of course He was homo superior being the Son of God!
ReplyDeleteexactly!
DeleteHow can you not know that the 3 helix is great for christians? Jesus was not an "anamoly" He's the son of God. This should give Christians more faith!
ReplyDeleteOf course the Saviour would have different DNA. One would expect GOD in the flesh to be so.
ReplyDelete